Search This Blog

Thursday, October 3, 2013

Jurisdiction to file petition in cyber crime....

There is no boundary for cyber world. Ipsofacto, the crimes in cyber world has also no boundaries. Its often a doubt even in the mind of common man, where to file a case if any offence of cyber crime is detected... whether it is at the place of occurrence...place of accused...
The traditional principles of jurisdiction in a criminal case are coupled with the new provisions of Information Technology Act in determining the place of filing a case in cyber crimes. 

A study on the same is available in the following link-

Jurisdiction and issues in cyber crime - A study

Thursday, September 26, 2013

Suspension of license for driving without helmet-- lawyer notice to Transport Commissioner by Social Justice Watch.

ലൈസന്‍സ് സസ്‌പെന്‍ഡ് ചെയ്യല്‍; ഋഷിരാജ് സിങ്ങിന് വക്കീല്‍ നോട്ടീസ്‌
T- T T+
കൊച്ചി: ഹെല്‍മെറ്റ് ധരിക്കാതെ ഇരുചക്രവാഹനം ഒടിച്ചതിന് ലൈസന്‍സ് സസ്‌പെന്‍ഡ് ചെയ്യുന്നതിനെതിരെ ട്രാന്‍സ്‌പോര്‍ട്ട് കമ്മീഷണര്‍ ഋഷിരാജ് സിങ്ങിന് വക്കീല്‍ നോട്ടീസ്. ചട്ടം മറികടന്നാണ് ഈ കുറ്റത്തിന് ലൈസന്‍സ് സസ്‌പെന്‍ഡ് ചെയ്യുന്നതെന്നാണ് നോട്ടീസില്‍ പറയുന്നത്. സോഷ്യല്‍ ജസ്റ്റിസ് വാച്ച് എന്ന സംഘടനയ്ക്കു വേണ്ടി അഡ്വ. ഷെറി ജെ.തോമസാണ് നോട്ടീസ് അയച്ചിട്ടുള്ളത്.

ഹെല്‍മെറ്റ് ധരിക്കാതെ ഇരുചക്രവാഹനം ഓടിക്കുന്നതിന് മോട്ടോര്‍ വാഹനനിയമത്തിലെ 177-ാം വകുപ്പുപ്രകാരം 100 രൂപ പിഴയാണ് വ്യവസ്ഥ ചെയ്യുന്നത്. കുറ്റം ആവര്‍ത്തിച്ചാല്‍ 300 രൂപ പിഴയിടാം. എന്നിരിക്കേ ഹെല്‍മെറ്റില്ലാത്തതിന്റെ പേരില്‍ ലൈസന്‍സ് സസ്‌പെന്‍ഡ് ചെയ്തുകൊണ്ട് ഇതിനകം ഇറക്കിയ ഉത്തരവുകള്‍ രണ്ടാഴ്ചക്കകം പിന്‍വലിക്കണമെന്നാണ് നോട്ടീസില്‍ പറയുന്നത്.

Monday, September 23, 2013

Non possession of Aadhar card is not a bar to get benefits...Supreme Court ordered that, possession of an Aadhaar card shall not be a requirement for availing any governmental benefit or service.

The Supreme Court, as an interim measure today, directed that the possession of an Aadhaar card shall not be a requirement for availing any governmental benefit or service. The direction was issued by the Court in a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by former Karnataka High Court Judge Justice KS Puttaswamy [Justice KS Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India & Ors., WP (c) 494/2012] challenging the constitutional validity of the Aadhaar scheme.
The matter was heard by a Division Bench comprising of Justices BS Chauhan and SA Bobde. The Court after hearing the parties also directed that no illegal migrants should be issued an Aadhaarcard.
The petitioner, Justice (Retd) Puttaswamy has sought the quashing of the Aadhaar scheme on the ground that it violates the right to privacy guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution in as much as it required the individuals obtaining an Aadhaar number to part with personal information, such as biometrics, iris scans and fingerprints. Justice Puttaswamy has also submitted that there are no safeguards or penalties and no legislative backing for obtaining personal information, and the proposed legislation introduced by the Government had been rejected by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance.
He has further contended that the Aadhaar scheme was linked to various governmental services and benefits like food security under the newly enacted Food Security Act, LPG subsidy, Employees’ Provident Fund, and other DBT benefits. Hence, he argues that an Aadhaar card is mandatory to avail these benefits, contrary to the government’s claim that it is a voluntary scheme. He has also alleged that unchecked allotment of Aadhaar numbers to all residents, including illegal migrants, was jeopardising national security and that scheme was introduced to gain political mileage.
Senior Counsel Anil Divan appeared for the petitioner and was assisted by Advocate Ankit Goel. Divan submitted that Aadhaar card has been made mandatory for registration of marriages in Jharkhand, for teaching and non-teaching staff to draw salaries in Maharashtra and for availing various government scholarships. He, therefore, sought for interim directions to safeguard the rights of the citizens. Appearing for the Central government, Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran and Additional Solicitor General L Nageswar Rao opposed any interim relief arguing that Aadhaarwas purely a voluntary scheme.
The Court, however, issued interim directions to the effect that Aadhaar card shall not be mandatory till the matter is decided and no Aadhaar should be issued to illegal migrants. It agreed to hear all the issues involved and posted the matter for final hearing for a non miscellaneous day. Since both Justice Chauhan and Justice Bobde are part of the Constitution Bench hearing a criminal writ petition, the case will be heard only after the conclusion of the Constitution Bench matter.  
Earlier, the Delhi High Court had also issued notice to the Central Government, Government of Delhi and the Unique Identification Authority of India in a petition filed by NGO Beghar Foundation seeking quashing of the Aadhaar scheme on similar grounds. 
Courtesy to barandbench.com.

Sunday, September 22, 2013

Cancellation/ suspension of license on driving without helmet..other traffic offences.. Whether legal?

The Transport Commissioner of Kerala, (2013) has issued directions via news media to suspend the licenses of persons who are riding motor vehicles without using helmet. Off course, these kind of direction may create panic among people and the retributive theory of punishment may work out. But is this legal ? Is it possible in a highly literate State like Kerala?

The punishment for driving without helmet will come under the general category in section 177 of the Motor Vehicles Act and the fine prescribed is only Rs 100. Can any Transport Commissioner or any officer act against the legislation ? The basic fact that these kind of directions may reduce accident death and it will cause more people to obey the law. But how far is this legal?
In strict sense, there cannot be a fine more than Rs 100 for booking a person under section 177 of Motor Vehicles Act for riding without a helmet. 
Likewise, in several junctions, the amount of fine such as Rs 1000.. etc are seen printed on boards for traffic violations. But imposing fine and fixing the quantum of fine whether it can be maximum or otherwise, it is the duty of the judiciary, and executive officers have no power to intervene in such matters. 
SUSPENSION OF DRIVING LICENSE - CANNOT BE ARBITRARY

Recent news show that, even on riding a motor cycle without helmet would invite suspension of the license. The section 20,21,22,23 of Motor Vehicles Act deals with the provisions of suspension, cancellation etc of the license. 
But those action can be done only on found guilty. If the person is not pleading guilty and contesting the matter, then also the question of aforesaid suspension by the detecting officer cannot be done. 
In one of the case in the year 1991 itself, Js Thulasidas of Kerala High Court held in Divakaran V. State of Kerala that, the cancellation/suspension of license cannot be done in capricious and arbitrary way. The interesting fact is that, the then lawyer who appeared in the said case Mr. P R Ramachandra Menon is a sitting judge in High Court of Kerala. 


Saturday, September 21, 2013

RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT - BRIEF IN MALAYALAM

വിവരാവകാശ നിയമം

വിവരാവകാശ നിയമം - 2005
പൊതു അധികാര സ്ഥാപനങ്ങളുടെ കൈവശമുള്ള വിവരങ്ങള്‍ എല്ലാ പൌരന്മാര്‍ക്കും ലഭ്യമാക്കുന്നതിനും പൊതു അധികാര കേന്ദ്രങ്ങളുടെ പ്രവര്‍ത്തനത്തില്‍ സുതാര്യതയും വിശ്വാസ്യതയും വര്‍ദ്ധിപ്പിക്കുന്നതിനും ജനങ്ങളോടുള്ള ഉത്തരവാദിത്വം നിലനിര്‍ത്തുന്നതിനും അഴിമതി നിര്‍മ്മാര്‍ജ്ജനം ചെയ്യുന്നതിനുമുള്ള വിവരാവകാശ നിയമം 2005 ഒക്ടോബര്‍ 12 മുതല്‍ പ്രാബല്യത്തില്‍ വന്നു. ഭരണഘടനാ പ്രകാരമോ ലോകസഭയുടെയോ നിയമസഭകളുടെയോ നിയമം വഴിയോ സര്‍ക്കാര്‍ വിജ്ഞാപനം വഴിയോ നിലവില്‍ വന്നതോ രൂപീകരിക്കപ്പെട്ടതോ ആയ എല്ലാ അധികാരികളും, സ്ഥാപനങ്ങളും സര്‍ക്കാരില്‍ നിന്നും ഏതെങ്കിലും തരത്തില്‍ സഹായധനം ലഭിക്കുന്ന സര്‍ക്കാര്‍ ഇതര സംഘടനകളും ഈ നിയമത്തിന്റെ പരിധിയില്‍ വരും. സര്‍ക്കാര്‍ സ്ഥാപനങ്ങള്‍, സര്‍ക്കാര്‍ സഹായധനം നല്‍കുന്ന സ്ഥാപനങ്ങള്‍ എന്നിവയുടെ അധീനതയിലുള്ള ഒരു ജോലിയോ, പ്രമാണമോ രേഖയോ പരിശോധിക്കുന്നതിനുള്ള അവകാശം, രേഖയുടെയോ പ്രമാണത്തിന്റെയോ കുറിപ്പുകളോ സംക്ഷിപ്തമോ എടുക്കല്‍, സാക്ഷ്യപ്പെടുത്തിയ പകര്‍പ്പുകള്‍, ഏതു പദാര്‍ത്ഥത്തിന്റെയും സാക്ഷ്യപ്പെടുത്തിയ സാമ്പിളുകള്‍ എടുക്കല്‍, കമ്പ്യൂട്ടറിലോ അതുപോലുള്ള മറ്റു ഇലക്ട്രോണിക് സംവിധാനങ്ങളിലോ ശേഖരിച്ചുവെച്ചിട്ടുള്ള വിവരങ്ങള്‍, പ്രിന്റൌട്ടുകള്‍,  ഫ്ലോപ്പികള്‍, ഡിസ്കുകള്‍, ടേപ്പുകള്‍, വീഡിയോ കാസറ്റുകള്‍ മുതലായ രൂപത്തില്‍ പകര്‍പ്പായി ലഭിക്കാനും ഏതൊരു പൌരനും അവകാശമുണ്ടെന്ന് നിയമം വ്യവസ്ഥ ചെയ്യുന്നു.
എല്ലാ സര്‍ക്കാര്‍ ഓഫീസുകളിലും പബ്ലിക് ഇന്‍ഫര്‍മേഷന്‍ ഓഫീസര്‍മാരെയും അസിസ്റ്റന്റ് പബ്ലിക് ഇന്‍ഫര്‍മേഷന്‍ ഓഫീസര്‍മാരെയും നിയോഗിച്ചിട്ടുണ്ട്. ഏതെങ്കിലും ഒരു കാര്യത്തെക്കുറിച്ച് വിവരം ലഭിക്കേണ്ടവര്‍ 10 രൂപ ഫീസ് സഹിതം ബന്ധപ്പെട്ട പബ്ലിക് ഇന്‍ഫര്‍മേഷന്‍ ഓഫീസര്‍ക്ക് അപേക്ഷ നല്‍കണം. രേഖാമൂലമോ ഇലക്ട്രോണിക് മാധ്യമം വഴിയോ അപേക്ഷ നല്‍കാം. അപേക്ഷ എഴുതി നല്കാന്‍ കഴിയാത്ത വ്യക്തി പറയുന്ന കാര്യങ്ങള്‍ രേഖപ്പെടുത്തി അപേക്ഷ തയ്യാറാക്കുന്നതിന് പബ്ലിക് ഇന്‍ഫര്‍മേഷന്‍ ഓഫീസര്‍ സഹായിക്കണം. അപേക്ഷകന്‍ വിവരം തേടുന്നത് എന്തിനാണെന്ന് വെളിപ്പെടുത്തേണ്ടതില്ല. ബന്ധപ്പെടുന്നതിനുള്ള വിലാസം മാത്രമേ അപേക്ഷയില്‍ കാണിക്കേണ്ടതുള്ളു. വിവരങ്ങളും രേഖകളും ലഭിക്കുന്നതിനുള്ള ഫീസുകള്‍ സര്‍ക്കാര്‍ നിശ്ചയിച്ചിട്ടുണ്ട്. ദാരിദ്ര്യരേഖയ്ക്ക് താഴെയുള്ളവരെ അവ തെളിയിക്കുന്നതിനുള്ള രേഖകള്‍ ഹാജരാക്കുന്ന പക്ഷം നിര്‍ദ്ദിഷ്ട ഫീസ് ഈടാക്കുന്നതില്‍ നിന്നും ഒഴിവാക്കിയിട്ടുണ്ട്.
അപേക്ഷ ലഭിച്ച് 30 ദിവസത്തിനകം പബ്ലിക് ഇന്‍ഫര്‍മേഷന്‍ ഓഫീസര്‍ അപേക്ഷകന് വിവരം നല്‍കണം. അസിസ്റ്റന്റ് പബ്ലിക് ഇന്‍ഫര്‍മേഷന്‍ ഓഫീസര്‍ വഴി ലഭിച്ച അപേക്ഷയാണെങ്കില്‍ 35 ദിവസത്തിനകം വിവരം നല്‍കിയാല്‍ മതി. എന്നാല്‍ വ്യക്തിയുടെ ജീവനെയോ സ്വാതന്ത്ര്യത്തെയോ ബാധിക്കുന്ന വിവരമാണ് ആവശ്യപ്പെടുന്നതെങ്കില്‍ അത് 48 മണിക്കൂറിനകം നല്‍കിയിരിക്കണം. ആവശ്യപ്പെടുന്ന വിവരം ലഭിക്കുന്നില്ലെങ്കിലോ അപൂര്‍ണ്ണവും അവാസ്തവവുമായ വിവരമാണ് കിട്ടിയതെങ്കിലോ അക്കാര്യത്തില്‍ പരാതിയുള്ള വ്യക്തിക്ക് അപ്പീല്‍ സംവിധാനവും നിയമത്തില്‍ വിഭാവനം ചെയ്തിട്ടുണ്ട്. നിയമം അനുശാസിക്കും വിധം വിവരം നല്‍കുന്നില്ലെങ്കില്‍ ബന്ധപ്പെട്ട ഉദ്യോഗസ്ഥനെതിരെ ശിക്ഷണ നടപടികളും നിയമം വ്യവസ്ഥ ചെയ്യുന്നു. സംസ്ഥാന ഇന്‍ഫര്‍മേഷന്‍ കമ്മീഷനാണ് വിവരാവകാശ നിയമം നടപ്പിലാക്കുന്നതും അവയിലെ പരാതികള്‍ തീര്‍പ്പാക്കുന്നതും ശിക്ഷാ നടപടികള്‍ സ്വീകരിക്കുന്നതുമായ അധികാരസ്ഥാനം.

എല്ലാ തദ്ദേശ സ്ഥാപനങ്ങളിലും പൊതു ജനങ്ങള്‍ക്ക് വിവരങ്ങള്‍ ലഭ്യമാക്കുന്നതിന് ഒരു ഇന്‍ഫര്‍മേഷന്‍ ഓഫീസറേയും ഒരു അപ്പലേറ്റ് അതോറിറ്റിയേയും നിശ്ചയിക്കാറുണ്ട്.സാധാരണ ഗതിയില്‍
പബ്ളിക് ഇന്‍ഫര്‍മേഷന്‍ ഓഫീസര്‍- മുനിസിപ്പല്‍ സെക്രട്ടറിയുടെ പി.എ ആയിരിക്കും
അപ്പലേറ്റ് അതോററ്റി മുനിസിപ്പല്‍ സെക്രട്ടറിയും ആയിരിക്കും
സംസ്ഥാന ഇന്‍ഫര്‍മേഷന്‍ കമ്മീഷന്‍
വെബ് സൈറ്റ് -http://keralasic.gov.in/
സംസ്ഥാന ഇന്‍ഫര്‍മേഷന്‍ കമ്മീഷന്‍

Thursday, September 12, 2013

Motor accident cases - what to do after accident- criminal case and claim case - Motor Vehicles Act.

Motor Accidents are common on the roads. Pursuant to the accident, altercation between the parties are also common in some minor accidents. Cursing each other and alleging fault upon the other side, people gathering and watching them around and finally police will come and direct both the vehicles to be taken to the Police Station...these are routine in busy routes in Kerala.

What are the cases follow?
If a motor accident is occurred and any of the party suffered injury, then offences under section 279, 337/338 of Indian Penal Code are usually charged. If the driver is not a person who is the profession of a driver or a Government Driver, people are ready to plead guilty of the above said offences and for the time being, the Magistrate courts in which these cases are tried will allow the accused to plead guilty by paying fine amount only. This can be done even in the absence of the accused through pleader. 
If any one dies in the Motor Accident, then the offence under section 304A of IPC will be charged and accused cannot go with fine alone, on pleading guilty in the said offence.

What the injured to do?
Rather than picking quarrel on the cause of the accident, it is better for the injured to get admitted in the hospital at the earliest. At the time of first instance itself, the cause of injury must be revealed to the duty doctor. Also mention the number of the vehicle which hit the injured.

Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal
On releasing from the hospital, the injured can claim compensation from the accused/driver and owner of the vehicle. They will be indemnified by the Insurance Company and the insurance company will pay compensation for the owner to the injured. For this purpose, all the bills, salary certificate, loss of income etc need to be brought in evidence. There is no limitation period for filing claim. The claim can be filed at the place of accident or where the claimant resides. 

Monday, September 9, 2013

Right to be represented by a lawyer- proceedings under the provision of Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act

The Section 17 of the Maintenance and Welfare of the Parents and Senior Citizens Act denies the right to be represented by a lawyer as far as the parties are concerned. This question was mooted before the High Court of Kerala and now it is settled position that, in view of the provisions of section 30 of the Advocates Act, the provisions in various statutes which deprives the right of legal representation for the parties had been watered down. In the result, the section 17 of the Senior Citizens Act (in short) cannot be a ground to deny the right to be represented by a lawyer in the proceedings.
However, this aspect is still not known to many of the presiding officers/RDOs exercising jurisdiction on the basis of this Act.
The Decision rendered by High Court of Kerala declared this right categorically. ..

A Latha Sumam V. District Collector  2013 2 KLT 233

"The issue involved in this case is with regard to the right of the petitioner to be represented through a lawyer before the Maintenance Tribunal & Revenue Divisional Officer in a proceeding filed under the provisions of The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007.....
.......... Reliance is sought to be placed on the law declared by the Apex Court reported in 2011
(3) KLT SN 150 ( case number 151) Venkatachalam v.Ajith Kumar C. Shah holding that, it is open for the persons like the petitioner to appoint an 'authorised agent' who can appear on behalf of the party....
.....The learned counsel for the petitioner however submits that, the idea and understanding of the second respondent with regard to the rights and liberties of the petitioner, to be represented through a lawyer, is not at all correct. More so, in view of the notification issued by the Central Government bringing Section 30 of the Advocates Act 1961 in to force with effect from 15/6/2011......
.........It is also brought to the notice of this Court that, there was an occasion for this Court to have considered similar issue, with reference to Section 30 of the Advocates Act, in respect of the proceedings before the Family Court, in the decision reported in 2011 (3) KLT 936 Saji v.Union of
India. With regard to the decision sought to be relied on from the part of the second respondent, it is seen that it was with reference to the rights and liberties of the party to be represented before the forum under the Consumer Protection Act 1986, 'through an authorised agent'. It however does not relate to the right of a lawyer to enter appearance on behalf of a litigant by virtue of the mandate under Section 30 of the Advocates Act 1961.
...............7. After hearing both the sides, this Court finds that, there is no dispute as to the fact that Section 30 of the Advocates Act, which was lying dormant right from the date of incorporation, till the parliament decided to give effect to the said provision with effect from 15/6/2011. By virtue of the said provision, the provisions contained in various statutes, restricting the right of a Lawyer, placing an
embargo with regard to the right to appear before the concerned forum Court/Tribunal has rather become watered down. The position has been discussed by this Court in detail as per the decision cited supra ie., 2011 (3) KLT 936 Saji v.Union of India........

Saturday, September 7, 2013

Twenty per cent seats for senior citizens in stage carriers in Kerala--Government Order

twenty per cent reservation of seats for senior citizens in stage carriers - Kerala Government Order

Twenty per cent seats in Stage Carriers in Kerala shall be marked for senior citizens. In accordance with the implementation of senior citizens act, the Kerala Motor Vehicle Rules are amended in this regard.
The Gov Order is available in above link.

Destitution Certificate - REGULATION FOR THE WORKING OF THE BOARD OF CONTROLCONSTITUTED UNDER THE ORPHANAGES AND OTHER CHARITABLE HOMES (SUPERVISION AND CONTROL) AMENDMENT ACT 2013

REGULATION FOR THE WORKING OF THE BOARD OF CONTROLCONSTITUTED UNDER THE ORPHANAGES AND OTHER CHARITABLE HOMES (SUPERVISION AND CONTROL) AMENDMENT ACT 2013

The Social Justice (C) Department of Government of Kerala published notification [G. O (P) No.52/2013/SJD Dated 22/6/2013 as S.R.O. No. 527/2013 in K.G. Ext No.1867 dt 28/06/2013] for regulating the working of board of control constituted under the Orphanages and Other Charitable Homes Act 1960.

It is amended in the Regulation 9, that, the following terms are included. – All admissions to a recognized home shall be based on a Destitution Certificate for an orphan in form No.I or a Destitution Certificate for a non-orphan in form II from the village officer of the village in which the person permanently resides.

This is the last amendment as on September 2013 in this law. The number of destitute are increasing, especially those who are in the old age. Most often they are abandoned in their own houses, when the children are roaming away for better pastures of life and profession. But this legislation is intended to regulate the orphanages and other charitable homes and to have a general standard for the betterment of the inmates. The moot point is what is the role of Government in this area? Regulations are always welcome and they are necessary. But Government need to pump more funds in this area and Government run homes are to be established more in number.

Now the situation is grim, and there exist a large number of charitable homes assuring care to the destitute and old age people. Obviously many of them are not registered but they are providing better amenities to their inmates. But want of registration does not make them a legally equipped home. Running a home without recognition is a cognizable offence, the same need to be tried in magistrate court.

Therefore, all the amendments and new regulations are significant and the managements of the respective homes are duty bound to comply with the same. 

Thursday, September 5, 2013

Petition to fix street lights on High Way - filed by Social Justice Watch Maradu Unit will be heard again on 4-10-2013.


Thetition filed (OP 111/2013) by SJW before the Permanent Lok Adalat against the street light issue in NH 47 bye pass and implementation of zebra cross in Kannadikkad Jn will be considered again on 4-10-13.
The Chairman D Papachan ordered the NH authorities who appeared before him, to file their statement before the next posting date. The Maradu Muncipality is also directed to file their statement within that day.
The case was filed by Maradu Unit of SJW.

Tuesday, September 3, 2013

A bold move from south... A discussion on method of analysis in food adulteration cases.

A bold move from south... 

A discussion on method of analysis in food adulteration cases.


When it comes from Delhi, it will get a special status. In legal parlance, when the dictum is aired from Supreme Court, obviously it is from Delhi. But even then, despite of all the legal obligations, someone will not care to follow the same. This was the prevailing attitude in South, in the case of Pepsico Case and Prevention of Food Adulteration matters.

The Supreme Court in Pepsico Case (2011 1 SCC 176), held that since there is no prescribed method of analysis as mandated by section 23 (1A)(ee)(hh) of erstwhile Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, the reports which are being followed by DGHS manual cannot be relied upon for a conviction in Food Adulteration cases. The Apex court categorically said that, the DGHS method (Director General of Health Service) is a secret method and unless and until it is laid down before the Parliament and get approval, the same cannot be used as a method for analysis in food cases. Therefore, the fate of all the Food Adulteration cases which depends on the analysis report of DGHS manual would have to result in an acquittal. Naturally, the effect is very sweeping and it may uproot the prosecution in umpteen food adulteration cases. But if the law is trite, there is no other denouement.

But though the Kerala High Court had its tradition in accepting the contentions which was raised in Pepsico case even much before the same was mooted before the Supreme Court. Justice A K Basheer in a unreported decision had held that, since the method of analysis is not known to the accused, there cannot be a conviction on the basis of such a secret method. The said case was not reported or not caused to be reported for various reasons. Thereafter the Pepsico case came. Justice Gopinathan of Kerala High Court, in some of his judgments, accepted the contention of Pepsico case and acquitted the accused in Food cases. But thereafter, Justice SatheesaChandran of Kerala High Court refused to follow the Pepsico case, even though it is rendered by the Apex Court. According to him, it was a different case and the circumstances were different. But it was apparent that, even a bare reading of Pepsico decision will make it clear that unless the method of analysis is approved by the legislature, the same cannot be relied upon. There is no room for the soft corner for the trial Judges who happened to follow the traditional existing method of prosecution and limiting the chances of defenses in Food Cases. If it is later reveals that they all were simply following a bad law, it ought to have changed.

At last, the Kerala High Court again showed its boldness to declare that Pepsio Case is binding on all Food cases and all the analysis on the basis of DGHS manual should go. Justice Kemal Pasha (2013 3 KLT 455) held that, the Pepsico case is squarely applicable to all food materials and its scope is not limited to carbonated drinks alone. The Judge also shown the boldness to report the matter in Journals. We do not know, when the Jurisdiction changes, whether the settled position would also change. However for time being, the air from Delhi is ruling the roost in this regard.

Monday, August 26, 2013

NEW RIGHTS FOR WOMEN OPTING FOR DIVORCE...THE PROPOSAL APPROVED BY RAJYASABHA

Rajya Sabha approved a proposal to make divorce friendly for women as it provides for the wife getting share in the husband's immovable property after "irretrievable breakdown" of marriage.
The Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill seeks to empower the courts to decide the compensation amount from the husband's inherited and inheritable property for the wife and children once the marriage legally ends.
The Bill allows both parties to file for divorce on the ground of "irretrievable breakdown" of marriage. Both parties have to live apart for at least three years before filing for such a petition.
Provisions have been made to restrict grant of a decree of divorce on ground of "irretrievable breakdown" of marriage if the court is satisfied that adequate provision for maintenance of children has not been made consistently with financial capacity of the parties to the marriage.
Also, the wife has the right to oppose the grant of a divorce on the ground that the dissolution could result in grave financial hardship.
Replying to a debate on the bill, Law Minister Kapil Sibal said it is a "a historic peace of legislation" in a patriarchal society like India where women, who constitute 50 per cent of the population, own only two per cent of the assets.
He said the divorce is "gender neutral" as either the wife or the husband can seek divorce. However, the right over property will not be gender neutral as wife can lay claim on husband's immovable property.
The Bill also provides that a court can take an ex parte decision on granting divorce if one of the two parties refuse to move a joint application.
As per the existing laws, the parties have to move a motion jointly between 6 and 18 months in case of divorce on grounds of mutual consent.
Courtesy- Indian Express

Friday, August 23, 2013

TAKING PHOTO ON MOBILE PHONE----AN ARTICLE ON THE BASIS OF A REAL STORYഅന്ന് ആനുവൽ ഡേ ദിവസമാണ് സംഭവം നടന്നത്. എല്ലാം കളർഫുൾ. ഉച്ചക്ക് ശേഷം സ്പോർട്സ്‌ ആയിരിന്നു.....

അന്ന് ആനുവൽ ഡേ ദിവസമാണ് സംഭവം നടന്നത്. എല്ലാം കളർഫുൾ. ഉച്ചക്ക് ശേഷം സ്പോർട്സ്‌ ആയിരുന്നു ...


IS TAKING PHOTO AN OFFENCE ? MOBILE PHONE PHOTO AND ISSUES- A REAL STORY...

നീതിയുടെ ഹീലിംഗ് ടച്ച്‌ കാത്ത്...Dalit Christians- Article on SC reservation for Dalit Christians.

സ്വതന്ത്ര ഭാരതത്തിലെ ഒരു കോടതി മുറിയാണ് രംഗം. മൊബൈൽ ഫോണിൽ ആരും അറിയാതെ കോടതിയിൽ നടന്നത് റെക്കോർഡ്‌   ചെയ്തു ഒരാൾ പുറത്തിറങ്ങി...

Read more... an article about the discrimination of Dalit Christians in India, for last six decades...

നീതിയുടെ ഹീലിംഗ് ടച്ച്‌ കാത്ത്...Dalit Christians


Tuesday, August 20, 2013

SARFESI ACT - The implications of the Act is really a nightmare to many poor debtors...

The Securitisation Act was introduced with a vigor to secure the unsecured assets. Obviously, the procedure for taking possession of the mortgage property become easier and less expensive for the Banks. But who is at the receiving end?
Now many banks are engaging third parties to property under their possession. The ordeal, mental and physical (threat) are unbearable as far as the illfated are concerned. Its purely like a private deal, even in the case of Nationalised Banks. Even a failure to pay a few installments may result in the initiation of the proceedings under the SARFESI Act..... its time to rethink about the rights and fate of illfated debtor.


SECURITISATION ACT- SARFESI

The conviction in a criminal case...will it treat as an evidence in a civil case?

Conviction in a criminal offence is no evidence of fact as which that conviction was based in a civil case in which those facts are in issue or form the subject matter of the suit. But when conviction is based on a plea of guilty, that plea is relevant and to prove it, the judgment in the criminal case is admissible in evidence in the subsequent civil suit in which the facts give rise to the charge are in issue or form the subject matter of the suit...
Taylors Treatise - law of evidence Vol II 1931 Edition Para 1694.

Motor accidents claim- Even if the injured failed to produce hospital bills, compensation for treatment can be allowed..

Motor accidents claim- Even if the injured failed to produce hospital bills, compensation for treatment can be allowed..
Assume a situation where you were admitted in hospital and were undergoing treatment for the accident which you met, due to rash and negligent driving of some other person on the public road. You omitted to keep the bills of the hospital expenses and medicine. However, you proceed to get compensation from the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal. During evidence, you have not produced the bills, because the same were not in your custody. Can the Tribunal award compensation for you in the particular head of hospital expenses ?
It was held in Muneera V. M D KSRTC, that even if the bills of hospital expenses are not maintained and produced before the Tribunal, notional compensation can be awarded to the injured. In the case in hand, the Division Bench of High Court of Kerala ordered to pay a compensation of Rs 20000/- towards the head of hospital expneses; even though no bills was produced by the injured/claimant. 

Thursday, July 25, 2013

NEW DRAFT POLICY ON LAND- HOMESTEAD TO ALL - CEILING OF LAND TO 15 ACRES - EXEMPTIONS TO RELIGIOUS,EDUCATIONAL...TO BE DISCONTINUED..THESE INSTITUTIONS SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED TO USE MORE THAN ONE UNIT OF 15 ACRES

India, being a predominantly agricultural society, has a strong linkage
between land and social status of an individual. The fact that close to 70 % of the
population is dependent on land, either as farmers or farm laborers, means that it is
imperative to address the issue of land in such manner that it provides livelihood,
dignity and food security to millions of Indians. India has the largest number of rural
poor as well as landless households in the world. Landlessness is a strong indicator
of rural poverty in the country. Land is the most valuable, imperishable possession
from which people derive their economic independence, social status and a modest
and permanent means of livelihood. But in addition to that, land also assures them of
identity and dignity and creates condition and opportunities for realizing social
equality. Assured possession and equitable distribution of land is a lasting source for
peace and prosperity and will pave way for economic and social justice in India.

(a) Creation of land pool 
i. In order to provide homestead land, minimum agricultural land, and shelter
to every family, it is essential that a land pool is created. The smallest unit in
this case will be a village or a cluster of villages, as the case may be, because it
is not realistic to expect people to migrate long distances for obtaining their
rights. The utilisation of the land pool for the purpose of homestead land or
agriculture shall begin as soon as the pool is created at the village / cluster
level.
ii. States shall work towards the creation of a land pool within a specified
timeframe comprising of, amongst others –
(a) agricultural waste land, whether illegally encroached or otherwise;
(b) restoration of land acquired, purchased and/or leased out to industries
etc. or acquired for development purposes/ projects but remaining
unutilised,
(c) surplus ceiling land by removing illegal occupation on those,
(d) Bhoodan land by removing illegal occupation on those ,
(e) Land being made available by correction of land records following
reconciliation of forest land and revenue land and
(f) Panchami land in Tamil Nadu/assigned land in Andhra Pradesh/ Gairan
land in Maharashtara also by removing illegal occupation on those.

(b) Assignment policy –
The States shall explore all available opportunities to create and maintain a
land pool in every village. For this purpose, the States shall
i. Conduct an inventory of government, ceiling surplus, bhoodan and other
categories of lands with the help of landless poor, Gram Panchayat, SHGs of
women, and Civil Society Organizations, under the supervision of Revenue
Authorities. As part of the inventory, comprehensive details about these
lands including details of current enjoyers should be collected and the
details should be made available to people.
ii. Evict ineligible encroachers of government lands, ceiling surplus and
bhoodan lands and distribute to the landless poor

(c) Time-bound assignment of land 
i. Distribute/Assign/Allot the available land to eligible land less poor,
particularly the Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and other marginalized
and deprived landless in a time bound manner both for agriculture and
house sites. The allotment of land should be made in the name of women
member in the eligible family. The list of beneficiaries should be prepared
with the approval of Gram Sabha. The list of beneficiaries should be made
available to the public.
ii. Settle all the pending applications for regularization of unobjectionable
occupations of government land by conducting a special drive in a time
bound manner.
(d) Ceiling surplus lands
There is an urgent need to re-visit the land ceiling limits in different
categories. Excluding the achievements of some States like West Bengal, Kerala, and
Jammu and Kashmir, the imposition of land ceilings has not led to any worthwhile
redistribution of agricultural land in the rest of the country. Some of the suggestions
are:
i. Every state should revise its ceiling limits, if the existing limit is more than 5-
10 acres in the case of irrigated land and 10-15 acres for non-irrigated land.
ii. Exemptions to religious, educational, charitable, research and industrial 
organizations as well as plantations and aqua farms should be strictly 
discontinued. These institutions shall not be allowed to use more than one 
unit of 15 acres. 
iii. States shall adopt ‘single window’ system for re-distribution of ceiling surplus
land within a specified time frame.
iv. All States shall impose ceiling not only on ‘Ownership’ of land holdings but
also on ‘Operational’ land holdings to prevent concentration of large tracts of
land through lease-in. Under no circumstance shall a
person/institution/organisation be allowed to own more land than the ceiling.
v. For the purpose of curbing and monitoring evasions of ceiling laws through
fraudulent land transactions, the Benami Transactions (Prohibition of the
Right to Recover Property) Act, 1989 shall be appropriately amended.
vi. All the ceiling surplus lands, which are stated to have been distributed to the
landless poor, shall be physically verified to see whether the assignees are in
possession and enjoyment of these lands. If not, steps shall be taken to see
that the assignees are given possession of lands.
vii. States shall prepare and maintain an inventory of all ceiling surplus lands and
make it available for public scrutiny.

Tuesday, July 23, 2013

റിയാലിറ്റി പരിപാടി ....

ചെറുപ്പത്തിൽ എവിടെയെങ്കിലും മനോരമ ആഴ്ചപ്പതിപ്പ് കണ്ടു ഒന്ന് പടം നോക്കിയാൽ തന്നെ അന്ന് വഴക്ക് കിട്ടുമായിരുന്നു. അത് പൈങ്കിളി കഥകളാണന്നും കുട്ടികൾ വായിക്കെണ്ടെന്നും പറയുമായിരുന്നു.
മനോരമ വായിച്ചു നടക്കുന്ന പൈങ്കിളി പെണ്ണുങ്ങൾ എന്നൊരു പ്രയോഗം തന്നെ ഉണ്ടായിരുന്നു. 
എന്നാൽ ഇന്ന് ആ കഥകൾ പലതും സീരിയലുകൾ ആയി ആണും പെണ്ണും അത് ദിവസവും നോക്കിയിരിക്കുന്നത് കാണുമ്പോൾ സങ്കടം തോന്നും. ഇപ്പൊ അവരില പലരും വാർത്തകളും ഇഷ്ടപ്പെട്ടു തുടങ്ങി. കാരണം ഇപ്പോൾ രണ്ടും പൈങ്കിളി തന്നെയെല്ലേ.
അതിനിടയിൽ മന്ത്രി കെ സി ജോസഫ്‌ പറഞ്ഞ ഒരു കാര്യം സത്യമാണ്. ആദിവാസികളുടെ ഇടയിലെ കാര്യങ്ങൾ പലതും അദ്ദേഹം പറഞ്ഞു. അതിനോടൊന്നും യോജിപ്പില്ല.
പക്ഷെ മന്ത്രി പറഞ്ഞ ഒരു കാര്യം ശരിയാണ് - ഇന്ന് നടക്കുന്ന പുതിയ റിയാലിറ്റി പരിപാടി - മലയാളി ഹൌസ് ഒരു ആഭാസ പരിപാടിയെന്ന് ... അത് തികച്ചും ശരി തന്നെ. ഒന്നുകിൽ അത് അഭിനയം അല്ലെങ്കിൽ അത് ആഭാസം തന്നെ. എതിരഭിപ്രായം ഉള്ളവരുണ്ടാകാം. പക്ഷെ അത് ആവിഷ്കാര സ്വാതന്ത്ര്യം എന്ന പേരിൽ മാത്രം അനുകൂലിക്കാം. പക്ഷെ കാര്യത്തിൽ അത് ആഭാസകരം തന്നെ .