Renewal of registration .. employment bureau
There is no SILENCE; but the voice is UNHEARD. This blog aims to update the social and legal views of the blogger. Mail: sherryjthomas@gmail.com Call @ 9447200500
Search This Blog
Wednesday, September 28, 2016
Monday, September 26, 2016
Thursday, September 22, 2016
Thursday, September 15, 2016
Full text of Judgment in Soumya/Saumya Rape and Murder case - Supreme Court of India.
DOWNLOAD
FULL TEXT OF JUDGMENT - SOUMYA MURDER CASE- SUPREME COURT
Courtesy to Live Law
Wednesday, September 14, 2016
SOUMYA RAPE AND MURDER CASE- ACCUSED ACQUITTED OF MURDER AND CONVICTED ON RAPE - SUPREME COURT
Download the Judgment of Supreme Court
Supreme Court Judgment - Soumya/Saumya Rape and Murder case
SOUMYA RAPE AND MURDER CASE- ACCUSED ACQUITTED OF MURDER AND CONVICTED ON RAPE - SUPREME COURT
Saturday, September 10, 2016
Supreme Court Directions regarding FIR
Thursday, September 8, 2016
Rajasthan high court quashed rape case FIR on marriage with victim.. Against the supreme court judgment.
The HC judgment, giving scope to conciliation brought about by marriage between the accused and the victim, is in direct violation of a Supreme Court verdict that leaves no scope for compromise and mediation in a rape case.
The Rajasthan High Court’s latest Judgment on a rape case goes against the Supreme Court ruling which states that in a case of rape or attempt of rape, there can be no question of compromise or mediation.
The court’s decision to quash all proceedings against a rape accused who filed a joint petition and appeared with the victim as a wedded couple, is against the SC verdict calling any compromise as ‘thoroughly and completely sans legal permissibility’.
The apex court Bench of Justice Dipak Misra and Justice Prafulla C. Pant had categorically stated in respect of cases where the rape accused marries the victim, that, “sometimes solace is given that the perpetrator of the crime has acceded to enter into wedlock with her, which is nothing but putting pressure in an adroit manner; and we say with emphasis that the courts are to remain absolutely away from this subterfuge to adopt a soft approach to the case, or any kind of liberal approach has to be put in the compartment of spectacular error. Or to put it differently, it would be in the realm of a sanctuary of error. We are compelled to say so as such an attitude reflects lack of sensibility towards the dignity, the élan vital, of a woman. Any kind of liberal approach or thought of mediation in this regard is thoroughly and completely sans legal permissibility”.
In this case, the victim and the accused filed a joint petition to quash the FIR filed earlier. The two claimed that the girl was forced by her parents to lodge a complaint, as they were against the relationship. It was out of her desire that she had entered into matrimony with the accused, the victim claimed.It was also pleaded that she has no grievances, whatsoever, against the other petitioners as well.The two provided documentary proof, including marriage certificate issued by Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai.
Taking cognizance of the candid disclosure by the girl that she has married the accused out of volition and that the latter has not committed any offence, whatsoever, and also the revelation that she was forced to file the FIR, Justice PK Lohra ordered quashing of the FIR and all proceedings, including investigations in the case, against the accused.
The Rajasthan High Court’s Judgment, giving scope to conciliation brought about by marriage between the accused and the victim, is in direct violation of the Supreme Court verdict, which leaves no scope for compromise and mediation in a rape case.
The Supreme Court’s judgment delivered on July 1, 2015, pronounced that any sort of compromise in a heinous case like rape is illegal against the spirit of justice. The apex court verdict had stated, “The dignity of a woman is a part of her non-perishable and immortal self and no one should ever think of painting it in clay. There cannot be a compromise or settlement as it would be against her honour, which matters the most. It is sacrosanct.”
Courtesy
Live Law
Thursday, September 1, 2016
Transgenders can submit gender option in Civil Service Examination. .told UPSC by Delhi High Court
Delhi High Court has directed the Union Public Service Commission to take necessary steps to include ‘Transgender/Third Gender’ as a gender option in the application form for the Civil Services (Preliminary) Examination.
WPC 5994.2015 dated 22.8.16