The
Law:
As
per the provisions of sub-rule (2) of Rule 100 of the Central Motor
Vehicles Rules, 1989 the glass of the windscreen and rear window of
every motor vehicle has to be such and be maintained in such a condition that
the visual transmission of light is not less than 70%. The glasses
used for side windows have to be such and be maintained in such
condition that the visual transmission of light is not less than 50%.
The Judgment (dated 28-4-2012) of Supreme Court of India banns sun films beyond visual transmission:
A bench of Chief
Justice S H Kapadia and Justices A K Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar went by the
limits prescribed in the MV Act and said anything beyond the visual light
transmission (VLT) limit of 70% for the front and rear windshields and 50% for
the side windows would be punishable.
The decision came on a PIL filed by Avishek Goenka, who had complained that cars
with black film on window panes were being increasingly used for crimes,
including sexual assault of women. He said though there was no express
restraint on use of black film under the MV Act, it prescribed VLT limits.
Writing the judgment for the bench, Justice Kumar said, "On the plain
reading of the rule, it is clear that cars must have safety glass having VLT at
the time of manufacturing... In other words, the rule not impliedly but
specifically prohibits alteration of such VLT by any means."
It's
illegal, but tinted glass windows in cars in the city are a common sight.
However, after the Supreme Court banned use of tinted glass beyond the
permissible limit, such defaulters are going to have a tough time. Traffic
police now intends to intensify the drive against use of tinted glass in
vehicles.
There
has been a traffic police drive against tinted car windows since last year.
However, there has been a lull in the prosecutions this year, with only 9,279
such prosecutions till April 15 this year. Last year, for the same period,
there had been as many as 30,582 prosecutions. Cops claim that better
compliance has resulted in lower prosecutions. At present, car owners who are
found not following the permitted percentage set for tinted glass have to
either hand in their registration certificate or their driving licence along
with the usual Rs 100 challan slapped on defaulters. "A notice is also
issued to them by traffic police and the defaulter has to report to the area
traffic inspector where the violation was recorded within 72 hours for
inspection of the vehicle.
As per the
permissible limit there should be at least 70% transparency in the film on the
front and rear windows while 50% transparency is required on the side
windows."Usually, since the fine is just a meagre Rs 100, which is nothing
compared to the money spent on films (ranging from Rs 700 to Rs 14,000 for the
more fancy ones that protect from UV rays), it is not much of a deterrent to
defaulters who continue to travel in the tinted vehicles.
The "Rules of Road Regulations, 1989" framed by the central
government under Section 118 of the Motor Vehicles Act state that, "A
driver of a motor vehicle and every other person using the road shall obey
every direction given, whether by signal or otherwise, by a police officer or
any authorized person for the time being in charge of the regulation of
traffic." Under the rule, even a traffic constable has the power to issue
notice to the defaulter, said traffic police. Tinted glass in vehicles has been
a major source of concern for women's security as well as criminal activities.
Delhi Police had earlier sent a proposal to the Union home ministry to amend
the Motor Vehicles Act to enhance fines on use of tinted glass. The amendment
is expected to increase the fine to a minimum of Rs 500. Tinted car windows
have helped criminals especially in cases of rape and murder.
From May 4,2012, if your car has black film on the front
and rear windscreens that blocks light by more than 30% and the tint on the
side window panes is more than 50%, then you could be in contempt of court in
addition to being prosecuted as per the rules provided under the Motor Vehicles
Act.
History:
The flagrant violation of the above
said rule by use of extremely dark coloured sun films/tints on window glasses
of cars led to the issuing of directions by the Hon'ble Punjab &
Haryana High Court on the matter in CWP No.7639 of 1995 - Nimit Kumar
versus Chandigarh Administration and Others. The Hon'ble High Court
restricted the use of 'Black Films on Window Glasses' to cars of only those
persons/ VIPs who needed to use such films to avoid serious security hazards.
The Hon'ble Court authorised the Director General of Police or an officer duly
authorized by him in this behalf (not below the rank of Additional Director
General of Police) to issue permissions for the purpose to such persons under
his seal and signatures. Consequent to this Court directive, permissions for
use of black films were issued by way of special authorization stickers. The
question that remained unsettled was whether these persons facing security risk
could be permitted to use films darker than what was stipulated by the Central
Motor Vehicle Rules. The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in its
earlier order dated 27-9-2004 in Civil Appeal No. 3700 of 1999 (arising
out of CWP 7639 of 1995) has directed that the mandate of sub-rule (2) of Rule
100 of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 has to be kept in view by the law
& order enforcing agencies while laying down any security requirement.