Search This Blog

Thursday, February 27, 2014

They are also consumers......Apartment owners waiting for completion indefinite...

Those who booked their flats with various projects are also consumers who are waiting for the offered service of the builders to get completed. If the builder fails to provide the flat in stipulated time and condition, the consumers can move the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum for the redressal fo their grievance. Moving civil court may cause advance payment of 10 % of the total value as Court Fee. Therefore, the settled position in law that, those who booked flats for their personal use from the builders will also come under the purview of consumers.
Builder converted the area for common recreation use as per the project to commercial purpose. Such disputes can also be handled in Consumer Courts. 2013 1 KHC 252

Wednesday, February 26, 2014

Self financing educational institutions - KSEB bill - conversion of Tariff from LT VI B to commercial tariffs - legality


The question is whether the self financing educational institutions are liable to pay commercial tariff as prescribed by KSERC ?

The judgments of High Court of Kerala in Brother Joseph Antony cases (etc) are under challenge before the Supreme Court of India. The  SLP No. 30968/09 is admitted by the SC and the operation of the order of the Division Bench of High Court of Kerala is stayed.
Pointing out this aspects, the High Court of Kerala again in another Writ Appeal, held that though the tariff can be converted to commercial, but the arrears cannot be claimed by the KSEB, till the final disposal of the Case. [(Writ Appeal 660/2010) Permanant Lok Adalat (Public Utility Services) OP No. 173/2012.)]


 “The question raised in the Writ Appeal is whether self financing educational institutions 
are liable to pay commercial tariff as prescribed by the Electricity Regulatory Commission. 
Even though similar parties succeeded in this Court to get the tariff cancelled, the Hon 
Supreme Court admitted SLP No. 30968/09 and granted stay against operation of the 
Division Bench Judgment of this Court. When the order of the Division Bench is stayed by 
the Hon Supreme Court, tariff revives and the KSEB is free to collect commercial tariff from self-financing educational institutions” and the Court disposed of the Writ Appeal with the following direction. 

“(1) KSEB is authorised to collect tariff in terms of the Regulatory Commission but the 

same will be subject to the result of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the batch of 
SLPs pending before the Supreme Court. 

(2) However, no arrears will be recovered until the Supreme Court decides the matter and 
thereafter recovery of arrears will be based on judgment of the Supreme Court, which will 
be applicable in appellant’s case also.”

Full text -
Order of State Electricity Ombudsman setting aside the commercial tariff for Self Financing Education Institutions.

When this is the present status as on date, the KSEB Assistant Engineers issuing notices, to the consumers for pending arrears are against the directions of  High court of Kerala and against the settled position by the KSE Ombudsman.

Friday, February 21, 2014

Tenants who are not in possession not eligible for protection... Rent control Act.


 High Court on eviction of tenant - who has no possession


KOCHI: Tenants won't be eligible for protection from eviction if they are not occupying the rented premises any longer, the Kerala high court held.

The ruling by a division bench comprising Justices K T Sankaran and P Ubaid came while considering a petition filed by C P Paul of Vytilla questioning Ernakulam rent control court's order to evict him from a building on MG Road in Kochi.

After taking a portion of Alangadan Buildings (1,200 square feet) on MG Road on rent, Paul had given the premises to his daughter and son-in-law for running a dental clinic. This was after he bought a five-storied building with total space of 30,000 square feet in the same locality, where he is running a hotel.

Declining to interfere in the rent control court's order, the judgment authored by Justice Ubaid said only those who are in possession of rented property has protection from eviction under Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act. Unscrupulous tenants, who try to continue on the premises by all means possible even when they have ceased to occupy the premises, or have otherwise handed over the premises to somebody, would not get the benefit of the protection under the Act. When such tenants come before the court, it must be the concern of the court that the provisions of the Act are not allowed to be misused, the court held.

The Act was introduced in Kerala with the social object of protecting tenants from unscrupulous and arbitrary eviction, while protecting the interests of landlords, the court pointed out.

The ruling by a division bench comprising of justices KT Sankaran and P Ubaid was while considering a petition filed by CP Paul of Vytilla questioning Ernakulam rent control court's order to evict him from a building at MG Road in Kochi.

After availing a part of Alangadan Buildings (1,200 square feet) on MG Road on rent, Paul had given the premises to his daughter and son-in-law for running a dental clinic. This was after he bought a five-storied building with total space of 30,000 square feet in the same locality, where he is running a hotel.

Declining to interfere in the rent control court's order, the judgment authored by justice Ubaid said only those who are in possession has protection from eviction under Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act. Unscrupulous tenants who would try to continue in the premises by all means possible, even when they have ceased to occupy the premises, or have otherwise handed over the premises to somebody, would not get the benefit of the protection under the Act. When such tenants come before the court, it must be the concern of the court that the provisions of the Act are not allowed to be misused, the court held.

The Act was introduced in Kerala with the social object of protecting tenants from unscrupulous and arbitrary eviction, while protecting the interests of landlords, the court pointed out. (Case no. RCR 407/2013)


News- TOI.

Thursday, February 20, 2014

HOSPITALS ARE "SHOPS" UNDER Kerala Shops & Commercial Establishments Act.

HOSPITALS ARE "SHOPS" 
UNDER Kerala Shops & Commercial Establishments Act.

In Lourdes Hospital v. Dr. Abraham Mathew, 2013 (4) KHC 347, the Kerala High Court held that a Hospital, even if it is involved only in charity work, comes within the definition of a ‘Shop’ under Section 2(15) of the Kerala Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1960. The court was dealing with the question of payment of gratuity to a superannuated employee. Relying on the definition of the Shop, the court held that Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 adopts the definition of ‘Shop’ by reference and all establishments which were covered by the definition at the time of adoption, remains covered under the Gratuity Act.

Minimum wages and Managers - legal application of Minimum wages act

Minimum Wages Act, 1948 -- S.5 -- Rubber Products Industry --
Managers, do not come under the definition of ‘employee’ under the Act

Therefore, it is held that the prescription of minimum wages for Managers, in the notification cannot be sustained
Petitioners, an Association and two Industries engaged in the Rubber Product
Industry, has approached the High Court challenging the notification revising
minimum wages and providing for such minimum wages to be paid to various
categories of employees engaged in the Rubber Products Industry. They
raised manifold contentions. The first one was that the imposition of service
weightage was bad in law. The next one was with respect to payment of
monthly salary to managerial staff. The next contention was with respect to
the disparity between the employers engaged in a particular industry. And
finally, for inclusion of Managers for whom also the minimum wages has been
prescribed. The Court repelled all the contentions except the last one.
Partly allowing the writ petition, the Court held:
A counter affidavit has been filed by the Government which would indicate
that what was intended was to cover “Managers without administrative and
managerial powers who come within the purview of the Act. It is also admitted that any Manager having managerial, administrative and financial powers does not come within the purview of the term ‘employee’”. Such a distinction  is merely illusory and Managers definitely would not come within the definition of ‘employee’ as defined under the Act. The provision of ‘minimum wages’ to Managers in Ext. P5 cannot be enforced by the Government and to that extent, Ext. P5 would be set aside. However, in all other respects, Ext. P5 is confirmed. 2013 4 KHC 841

CRZ -Governemnt Order to implement regulartions- Witdrawal order - LSGD order dated 13-2-14 - Kerala Governent

Wednesday, February 19, 2014

Compensation for victims in crime..

The scheme for compensation under section 357A of criminal procedure code is to be implemented in Kerala soon....

TRANSFER OF PROPERTY - USE OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY - RESTRICTIONS WHEN VOID

USE OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY - RESTRICTIONS WHEN VOID


Absolute Right- 
According to Section 11 of the Transfer of property Act, 1882, where on a transfer of property, an interest therein is created absolutely in favour of any person, but the terms of the transfer has a rider clause that such interest shall be enjoyed by the transferee in a particular manner, he shall be entitled to receive and dispose of such interest as if there were no such direction. Further, Sec 11 stipulates that there can be no restriction on the enjoyment of property which has been transferred absolutely. Similarly, the vendee of an immovable property is entitled to ignore the condition which cuts down enjoyment of his absolute right over the property. In cases, where the property has passed absolutely to the Purchaser, any direction contained in the sale deed contrary to the absolute enjoyment is void and is not enforceable.
Exception:
But, there is an exception to this principle. The same section 11 provides that if any restrictions are imposed on a portion of an immovable property for purposes of securing the beneficial enjoyment of another portion of the same property, then the restrictions imposed shall be construed to be valid. This kind of situation arises mostly in cases where a portion of the property is transferred and another portion is retained by the Owner, the Owner may put some reasonable restrictions on the use of the property sold for the beneficial use of portion of property retained by him. However, such restrictions are not binding on third parties who are not a party to the contract.

Monday, February 17, 2014

HOW TO TRACE MISSING KERALITES IN FOREIGN COUNTRIES ?

The NORKA (Non-Resident Keralites’ Affairs Department (NORKA) can help to locate the missing Keralites abroad.


Help to Trace the Missing Keralites 
It is found that a large number of Keralites are reported to be missing abroad. The reason for missing may differ from case to case. Some of them may be put to jails for dereliction of proper documents or some offences. Because of the relative's inability to follow through, most of them remain missed invariably. 
As a nodal agency for the cause of NRKs, Norka-Roots cannot sit tight-handed in such a situation. So we would like to join the relative's plight to trace the missed ones abroad using the help of Government and other agencies. 
It is decided that the relatives of near ones should report Norka-Roots the missing of the expatriate as soon as it is confirmed. At the same time, the missing should be reported to the police also. The petitioners should forward the complaints to the Superintendent of Police in the respective districts. The petition to Norka-Roots should contain the FIR number, date, Police Station, Police Circle and District. We shall release the data of the missing person along with a photograph to the public through media once we get the report of confirmation from the District Police Superintendent. 

The complaint form can be downloaded from the Web site of NORKA-

COMPLAINT FORM - DOWNLOAD

Sunday, February 16, 2014

Kerala Government issued circular for strict implementation of Court Order, not to affix any advertisement in trees.


NO ADVERTISEMENTS ON TREES - ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

Trees are not meant for putting hoardings and banners. Held the Court, while dealing with a letter written by a couple of School Students. This is trite law. But not a new law. It only points out the established principles of Environmental Protection Act.

For the strict implementation of the directive, the LSG issued circular to the officials. Nevertheless to say, the circular says, all forms of advertisement, either by nailing and other form... banned. 

The Hon”ble High Court of Kerala initiated suo-moto proceedings [WP(C) No. 14591/2011] on a petition from the students of 
St. Augustine”s Girls Higher Secondary School , Muvattupuzha against erection of Hoarding on trees using iron nails. The Hon”b1e High Court of Kerala vide judgment cited has directed the Government that the local authorities or any other statutory authorities should not be permitted to affix or display any hoarding/advertisement on the trees either by usíng nails or any 
other form.


Circular issued by Local self Government Kerala for public to be cautious while purchasing plots for construction- guidelines

LSGD guidelines for public while purchase property for construction and constructed buildings

Normally, people purchase property for the construction of their dream home by using their hard earned money. But due to lack of awareness and knowledge the purchased plot/building may be lacking the legal back up.
The LSGD Kerala issued a detailed circular in Malayalam to take care of the sanctions while purchasing a plot for construction of house or while purchasing shop rooms, buildings etc.
Ignorance of law is not an excuse!

Can a Gift deed cancelled by the donor? If mutation is effected ?

The human mind is always unpredictable and if a deed of gift, registered in favour of the donee; until and unless mutation is effected and possession is given, the donee would always be reckless if he know the law on the subject.
There occurred several issues, which resulted in the cancellation of the already registered gift deeds.
Theoretically, it is a unilateral transaction and the donor is entitled to cancel the gift deed.
But if the mutation is effected, it cannot be cancelled without the participation of the donee. (2012 KHC 2999); (2012 KHC 2886).

Upgradation of Cyber Capabilities of Kerala Police - Circular issued by Director General of Police


Sub: Upgradation of Cyber Capabilities of Kerala Police and Integration of Cyber Police Station and Hi-Tech Cell- Orders Issued

The following instructions are issued for upgradation of the Cyber Capabilities of Kerala Police and for the effective functioning of Cyber Police Station and Hì-tech cell.

cyber crimes - upgradation of Kerala Police capabilities

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B5FcgaPlAV7SSS1Ia3VXVWp0c1U/edit





Tuesday, February 11, 2014

HOW TO CORRECT DATE OF BIRTH - KERALA - Correction of Date of Birth in Panchayath/Muncipal/Corporation Records...birth register

Obviously, large number of people are running from pillar to post due to the red tapes in correction of Date of Birth in their registers. There are number of instances which the date of birth entered in the birth register may be wrong, even them people pursue with it due to the difficulty in correcting the same.
The Division Bench of Kerala High Court held that, the circulars issued by the Government cannot deny the right to correct the wrong entries in the birth register --- full text of Judgment-


-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram : S. R. Bannurmath, C. J. ; *Kurian Joseph, J. ( Kerala High Court )
Date : 09/11/2009
CaseNo. : W. A. No. 1483 of 2009
Party : Chalakkudy Municipality and Another v. Minor Malavika and
Another.

JUDGMENT
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Kurian Joseph, J.

1. Law is for man and not man for law. The simple difference between man
and machine is that machine follows the letter of law but man applies the spirit
of law. Once this principle is properly understood, it is not difficult to
understand, interpret or apply any law in a given situation. While analysing the
facts of this case and the legal issues involved in the same we find the above
mentioned principle would serve as a guiding spirit in deciding the case.

2. The Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969 came into force in Kerala
with effect from 01/04/1970. The Act is intended to provide for the regulation
of registration of births and deaths and for matters connected therewith. S.14
provides for the registration of the name of a child on birth and S.15 provides
for correction or cancellation of entry in the register of births and deaths. The
Kerala Registration of Births and Deaths Rules, 1999 came into force on
01/01/2000. The said Rules have been framed in exercise of the powers
under S.30 of the Act. S.30(l) empowers the State Government to frame Rules
providing for 'the correction of errors and the cancellation of entries in the
register of births and deaths'. R.10 provides for the procedure of registration
of births and R.11 provides for the correction or cancellation of entry in the
register of births and deaths.

3. For the purpose of easy reference the provisions are extracted below:
'S.14. Registration of name of child. -- Where the birth of any child has been
registered without a name, the parent or guardian of such child shall within the
prescribed period give information regarding the name of the child to the
Registrar either orally or in writing and thereupon the Registrar shall enter
such name in the register and initial and date the entry.
S.15. Correction or cancellation of entry in the register of births and deaths. --
If it is proved to the satisfaction of the Registrar that any entry of a birth or
death in any register kept by him under this Act is erroneous in form or
substance, or has been fraudulently or improperly made, he may, subject to
such rules as may be made by the State Government with respect to the
conditions on which and the circumstances in which such entries may be
corrected or cancelled, correct the error or cancel the entry by suitable entry
in the margin, without any alteration of the original entry, and shall sign the
marginal entry and add thereto the date of the correction or cancellation.
R.10. Period for the purpose of S.14. -- (1) Where the birth of any child had
been registered without a name, the parent or guardian of such child shall,
within 12 months from the date of registration of the birth of child, give
information regarding the name of the child to the Registrar in writing:
Provided that if the information is given after the aforesaid period of 12
months which shall be reckoned, subject to the provisions of sub-section (4)
of S.23, the Registrar shall enter the name in the relevant column of the
concerned form in the birth register on payment of a late fee of rupees five.
(2) The parent or the guardian, as the case may be, shall also present to the
Registrar the copy of the extract given to him under S.12 or a certified extract
issued to him under S.17 and on such presentation the Registrar shall make
the necessary endorsement relating to the name of the child.
R.11. Correction or cancellation of entry in the register of births and deaths. --
(1) If it is reported to the Registrar that a clerical or formal error has been
made in the register or if such error is otherwise noticed by him the Registrar
shall enquire into the matter and if he is satisfied that any such error has been
made, he shall correct the error (by correcting or cancelling the entry) as
provided in S.15 and shall send an extract of the entry showing the error and
how it has been corrected to the State Government or the officer specified by
it in this behalf.
(2) If any person asserts that any entry in the register of births and deaths is
erroneous in substance, the Registrar may correct the entry in the manner
prescribed under S.15 upon production by that person a declaration setting
forth the nature of the error and true facts of the case made by two credible
persons having knowledge of the facts of the case.
(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-rule (1) and sub-rule (2) the
Registrar shall make report of any correction of the kind referred to therein
giving necessary details to the State Government or the officer specified in
this behalf.
(4) If it is proved to the satisfaction of the Registrar that any entry in the
register of births and deaths has been fraudulently or improperly made, he
shall make a report giving necessary details to the officer authorised by the
Chief Registrar by general or special order in this behalf under S.25 and on
hearing from him take necessary action in the matter.
(5) In every case in which an entry is corrected or cancelled under this rule,
intimation thereof should be sent to the permanent address of the person who
has given information under S.8 or S.9.'
The Chief Registrar of Births and Deaths (Kerala) has also issued various
circulars regarding the procedure to be followed in making the entries and
correction of the entries. In the circular dated 24/03/1997 it is made clear that
the name as such cannot be substituted. However, corrections if any, can be
made in case the Registrar is satisfied as to the genuineness of the error. Still
further it is stated in the circular that any correction in the name of the parents,
address, sex, religion, community, date of death, name of the deceased,
name of the husband, father etc. of the deceased, can be made, in case the
application is after five years, only with the permission of the Chief Registrar.
It is also stated in the circular that any correction in the substance and change
in name etc. can be done only with the prior permission of the Chief Registrar.
Yet another clarification in the circular is that the correction shall be made only
in the margin of the register and when certificates are issued, only the new
entries need be shown in the certificates. However, the certificates, if any,
issued prior to the corrections should be returned and cancelled.

4. Going by the purpose of the enactment and the scheme for registration
and for correction in the entries therein, it is unambiguously clear that
corrections either in form or substance is permissible. The only pre condition
is that the Registrar should be satisfied that the entry in the register regarding
birth or death was erroneous in form or substance or the same has been
fraudulently or improperly made. The entry in the register means the entries
on the name and the particulars regarding the relationship, place and date. If
the correction is sought within five years, the satisfaction need only be at the
level of the Registrar and if the correction is sought to be made after five
years, the corrections can be made only on the satisfaction of the Chief
Registrar. The identity of the person concerned is the crucially relevant factor,
as far as correction of the name is concerned and as far as the correction of
the date, place and other particulars are concerned, in case there had been
any mistake in the original entry and if the Registrar is satisfied that the same
is erroneously entered, he has to exercise his power to permit the correction.
The law does not contemplate a person to have a wrong name in the register
or a mistaken identity in the register or to have wrong particulars regarding the
date, place etc. in the register of birth or death. It is also to be noted that the
Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969 does not create or extinguish any
right; the Act is intended only to regulate the process and procedures of
registration of births and deaths and the correction of any such entry. Once
the Act permits such correction either in form or substance, the Rules are
intended only to regulate the procedure and not to prohibit such correction.
The subordinate legislation by way of rules, notifications, circulars etc. cannot
restrict the scope of the plenary legislation. Conversely they cannot expand
the scope either, as far as the correction of the entries in the register of birth
or death is concerned. S.15 only contemplates that the Registrar should be
satisfied as to the mistake in the entry. The section clearly states that the
correction can either be in the form or substance also. R.11 would also
indicate that once the Registrar is moved for correction of any entry in the
register of birth or death, it is mandatory on his part to enquire into the matter
and once he is satisfied that the entry is erroneous, the rule mandates that the
correction should be made as required under S.15 of the Act. In such
circumstances it is for the Registrar concerned to intimate the Government
and all concerned and also, if required, to take further action under S.25 for
prosecution in case the mistaken entry was fraudulently or improperly made.

5. The circular of the Registrar dated 24/03/1997 stipulates that once the
corrections are made, before issuing the fresh certificate, all the certificates
issued earlier should be got back and cancelled. For the purpose of the
present case, it is also necessary to deal with the said aspect. The certificates
are issued for production before an authority or officer concerned. There
cannot also be two types of certificates with the person, one with the
erroneous entry and the other with the corrected entry. But in case the
certificate already issued has either been irrecoverably lost or cannot be
returned having been produced before any authority and that authority refuses
to return the same and if the Registrar is satisfied as to the inability of the
applicant in such circumstances to produce the certificates already issued
with the wrong entry, nothing prevents the Registrar to issue a fresh certificate
with the corrected entry indicating therein that all the certificates issued prior
to the correction with the wrong entries would stand cancelled. The circular
has insisted for the return of the old certificates only for the purpose of
cancellation. In case the same cannot be produced and if the Registrar is
satisfied that the same cannot be produced for justifiable reasons, some of
which are referred to above, the Registrar cannot refuse to issue a fresh
certificate, on that only ground. As far as the facts in the present case are
concerned, the appellant Municipality was approached by the writ petitioner
for correction of the name of the father of the petitioner in the register of births.
Petitioner's father's name is Sajeev Velappan Nair, but the entry in the register
is 'Sajeev N. Nair'. According to the Municipality, certificates had already been
issued noting the name of the father as Sajeev N. Nair and unless the
certificates are returned, a fresh certificate could not be issued. The learned
Single Judge, on being satisfied as to the inability of the writ petitioner to
produce the certificates already issued by the Municipality, directed to issue a
fresh certificate with the correction in the name of the father of the petitioner.
In view of what we have already stated above, we are in full agreement with
the view taken by the learned Single Judge, though for additional reasons
stated by us.
Therefore, we do not find any merit in the writ appeal. It is accordingly
dismissed.

Wednesday, February 5, 2014

Short relief for coastal people - fight against anti people circulars - CRZ notification- State Government decided to withdraw the circulars issued for strict compliance of CRZ.

LATEST NEWS
  Feb 06, 2014
à´¤ീà´°à´¦േശത്à´¤് 100 à´šà´¤ുà´°à´¶്à´°à´®ീà´±്റര്‍ വരെà´¯ുà´³്à´³ à´µീà´Ÿ് à´¨ിà´°്‍à´®്à´®ിà´•്à´•ാà´¨്‍ à´…à´¨ുമതി
T- T T+
à´¤ിà´°ുവനന്തപുà´°ം: à´¤ീà´°à´¦േശത്à´¤് 100 à´šà´¤ുà´°à´¶്à´°à´®ീà´±്റര്‍ വരെ à´µിà´¸്à´¤ീà´°്‍ണമുà´³്à´³ à´µീà´Ÿ് à´¨ിà´°്‍à´®്à´®ിà´•്à´•ാà´¨്‍ à´…à´¨ുവദിà´•്à´•ുà´¨്à´¨ à´°ീà´¤ിà´¯ിà´²്‍ à´¤ീà´°à´¦േശപരിà´ªാലന à´¨ിയമത്à´¤ിà´²്‍ à´®ാà´±്à´±ം വരുà´¤്à´¤ും. പരമ്പരാà´—à´¤ à´•ുà´Ÿുംബസ്വത്à´¤് ലഭിà´š്ചവര്‍à´•്à´•ാà´£് à´µീà´Ÿ് à´¨ിà´°്‍à´®്à´®ിà´•്à´•ാà´¨്‍ ഇളവ് നല്‍à´•ുà´•. à´¨ിയമസഭയിà´²്‍ à´¡ൊà´®ിà´¨ിà´•് à´ª്രസന്à´±േà´·à´¨്à´±െ സബ്à´®ിà´·à´¨് മറുപടി പറയുà´®്à´ªോà´³്‍ à´®ുà´–്യമന്à´¤്à´°ി ഉമ്മന്‍ à´šാà´£്à´Ÿിà´¯ാà´£് ഇക്à´•ാà´°്à´¯ം à´…à´±ിà´¯ിà´š്à´šà´¤്.

à´¤ീà´°à´¦േശപരിà´ªാലന à´¨ിയമത്à´¤ിà´²െ à´®ൂà´¨്à´¨ു സര്‍à´•്à´•ുലറാà´£് സര്‍à´•്à´•ാà´°്‍ à´ªിà´¨്‍വലിà´•്à´•ുà´•. à´¨ിലവിà´²െ à´¨ിയമത്à´¤ിà´²്‍ à´µീà´Ÿ് നവീà´•à´°ിà´•്à´•ുà´¨്നതിà´¨ോ à´ªുനര്‍à´¨ിà´°്‍à´®്à´®ിà´•്à´•ുà´¨്നതിà´¨ോ à´®ാà´¤്à´°à´®ാà´£് à´…à´¨ുമതിà´¯ുà´³്ളത്. ഇതിà´¨ൊà´ª്പമാà´£് à´•ുà´Ÿുംബസ്വത്à´¤ുà´³്ളവര്‍à´•്à´•ും à´µീà´Ÿ് à´µെà´•്à´•ാà´¨ാà´¯ി à´¨ിയമത്à´¤ിà´²്‍ ഇളവ് വരുà´¤്à´¤ുà´¨്നത്.

http://www.mathrubhumi.com/story.php?id=428027